![]() Subject: Designer Footwear from Gucci Prada Chanel & More, buy direct, forget department store prices I’m reverting back to 2.6.5 to see if the problem persists. This seems to have started when I upgraded to 2.6.6. I looked at my whitelist and saw a number of very suspicious addresses on it, which make me think SS has missed more of the false negatives I’ve trained manually. But SS has no record of my marking it, so it kept the address in the whitelist and let other spams with that address through. ![]() I mark all spam that gets through as false positives, and I specifically remember marking this one, as I thought the subject was particularly weird. The log shows Spam Sieve marking it as good, but there’s no entry that shows where I marked it as a false positive. Notice the entries for, the subject wonyun. I’ve reproduced an example from my log below. ![]() In fact, it is named a highly effective and advanced spam blocker since it has a 99.9 spam catch rate along with a 0.003 false rate. ![]() This solution can protect your business and schools from malicious links to websites coming through your emails. It looks like SpamSieve is sometimes not acknowledging when I train a false positive. It can block spam emails, viruses, malicious email threats, malware, and ransomware. I dug through my log and I noticed something strange. Before I might get one a day in my inbox, but now I’m seeing six or seven, sometimes more. Over the past few weeks Spam sieve has been letting more spam through than it has been. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |